We need to take care of ourselves, too! We've got delicious and easy recipes, the latest fashion and home decor trends, health topics that impact every woman and so much more. So grab a cup of coffee and dig in.
It truly takes a village to raise a child, and we're here for you! Link up with a community of moms just like you and learn about fabulous events in your area plus amazing product giveaways, discounts and more!
Soon enough we will be
asked to elect a new president. The debates
have started—at least on the Republican side of things—and the field of candidates is already crowded (again, for the GOP).
It can be hard to determine where candidates stand on certain issues. If you're not Donald Trump talking about immigration, most voters will
need to dig a deeper to get the candidates' take on family issues: maternity and paternity leave, child care, education, equal pay and healthcare for starters.
I've done the research and broken it down among the current roster of front-running hopefuls. Let the 2016 Election Games begin!
Donald Trump: To date, the candidate has not articulated positions relevant to family policy. The only official positions he has made his stance clear on relate to guns and
immigration. If you dig a deeper, though,
The Donald gives you a hint of where his values lie. He is against the Common Core State Standards and supports school choice. He's been all
over the board on women's reproductive rights, starting out pro-choice but now
leaning towards his base's opposition of a woman's right to choose. He says he would support exceptions for legal
abortions in pregnancies related to rape, incest or the medical health of the
mother. Oh, and if that last debate was
any indication, Trump insists on linking
vaccines to autism, a stance he first promoted in 2007.
Ben Carson: Looking at his official website, Dr. Carson
identifies a few policies of importance to women and families. He calls himself "unabashedly and entirely
pro-life." No exceptions. As far as education, the good doctor is
against Common Core and believes education is a local—not
federal—matter. He is against the
Affordable Care Act and believes Health Savings Accounts administered
through employers are a better solution to drive down costs. Oh, and he says he wants, "More freedom and
less government in our health care system," except, obviously, for women
considering abortion. In that case, he
prefers less freedom and more government.
Bonus points go to Carson and Sanders for detailing their priorities in accessible, easy to navigate sites.
Jeb Bush: His website does not detail positions
relevant to family policy, but because of his long history in politics, they
are easy enough to track down. Just this month, Jeb has vowed to defund
Planned Parenthood federally if elected, just as he did in
Florida. He remains solidly
pro-life. Bush also supports school
choice and created a voucher program in Florida that allowed public funds to
cover the cost of private and religious education. Unlike most other Republican candidates, Bush
has not outright condemned the Common Core. Originally very supportive of the new education standards, last
month he suggested states should choose for themselves which mandates to
follow. He strongly supports vaccines.
Carly Fiorina: As you might expect, Carly's official website
(where, strangely, she never uses her last name) focuses on her gender being an
asset in the race. She shares her
history, including an inspiring quote from her mom, a photo of her during
treatment for breast cancer and the sad news that she lost a daughter. Fiorina's
step-daughter, Lori, died at 34 years old of a drug overdose. Aside from Fiorina's story, though, which is nicely
packaged, there are no links related to official
policy or her platform. With a bit of sleuthing, I found out Fiorina supports school choice and vouchers, is pro-life, is against the
Affordable Care Act and believes the Supreme Court overstepped its role in
legalizing same sex marriages.
If I could, I would give time-outs to Donald Trump and Carly Fiorina for the total lack of relevant information on their slick sites. Less is not always more.
Hillary Clinton: Clinton's website, if you can maneuver past
the annoying ask for money and email address, provides her official
stance on issues, including family-related policies. She supports expanding early childhood
programming and access to pre-schools. She supports closing the wage gap between men and women. She supports a guaranteed family paid leave
to care for a sick family member or after the birth of a child. (That one got my attention.) She also endorses an investment in childcare
costs for working parents and college students with children. On her website, you'll find her official
take on issues pertinent to families like women's rights, K-12 education,
healthcare, campus sexual assaults and climate change.
Bernie Sanders: The senator from Vermont has a page on his
site dedicated to "Real Family Values,"
where he details how America lags behind other nations on things like paid time
off after the birth of a child, paid sick time and a guaranteed paid vacation—though it is slight in details about how this would be accomplished. There are a lot of specifics, though, in the "Sanders
Plan," his initiative to lower the cost of prescription drugs. He is pro-choice and against the gender pay
gap. As for education, he supports the
Common Core and charter schools, if they are held to the same
standards of public schools. Oh! And how about a free
college education? Bernie wants to
provide that, too.
So there they are, moms—some of our 2016 presidential candidates in a nutshell. Bonus points go to Carson and Sanders
for detailing their priorities in accessible, easy to navigate sites. If I could, I would give time-outs to
Donald Trump and Carly Fiorina for the total lack of relevant information on
their slick sites. Less is not
We're just at the cusp of this
race, folks. I hope this information piques
your curiosity to learn more.