Our Privacy/Cookie Policy contains detailed information about the types of cookies & related technology on our site, and some ways to opt out. By using the site, you agree to the uses of cookies and other technology as outlined in our Policy, and to our Terms of Use.


Expectant Moms Could Avoid a C-Section, Study Finds

Photograph by Twenty20

There's good news and bad news for expectant mothers, according to a new study. While the bad news is that you could be in active labor significantly longer than what was once thought standard, the good news is that longer labor is normal and safe. That means that labor can progress slowly without the need for Pitocin, a drug that helps the uterus contract during labor, or a cesarean section. C-sections come with risks, and in some cases, it appears that patience could help women avoid them.

A new study conducted in Africa, published earlier this month in PLOS Medical Journal, found that normal labor can progress significantly slower than what was considered standard based on data from the 1950s. Past data stated that women in active labor should dilate one centimeter every hour. Anything slower than that rate has historically been considered abnormal and a cause for concern.

However, in the more than 5,500 births researchers analyzed in the new study, the average amount a mother dilated in an hour was closer to one half of a centimeter. These births resulted in positive outcomes with healthy babies delivered vaginally from healthy mothers, with no need for induction medication or a C-section.

In his findings, the lead researcher, Olufemi T. Oladapo, advises against relying on the old idea that a woman must progress at the rate of one centimeter per hour, stating, “The application of population average labor curves could potentially misclassify women who are slowly but normally progressing as abnormal and, therefore, increase their chances of being subjected to unnecessary labor interventions.”

This new study adds to advice given four years ago when a similar study based in the United States found comparable results. Researchers point out, “It may be necessary to revisit the definition of labor dystocia [failure to progress] because recent data show that contemporary labor progresses at a rate substantially slower than what was historically taught.”

It turns out that women might simply need more time.

Expectant mothers should know that they can talk to their doctors about the new study before they go into labor. That way, they can advocate for themselves. There are, of course, many valid medical reasons for a C-section. But with low-risk births where the only hiccup is slow progression, a C-section might be safely avoided.

More from news